Detailed functional description#

Generic Single Substance Emission Model (EM_GSS)#

Introduction#

This process quantifies releases to various compartments and routes them to the final recipients: surface waters and soils. It is applied for a single substance.

Releases are defined for:

  • Atmospheric deposition: dry deposition as mass/time/surface area, wet deposition as mass/volume in precipitation;

  • A variable number of “type A” sources;

  • A variable number of “type B” sources.

The quantification of the releases of polutants associated to the various sources proceeds by the emission factor method. A variable collection of sources can be considered. Releases (\(L\)) of a pollutant “p” for a certain socio-economic activity “a” are calculated by multiplying an activity rate (\(AR_a\)) by an emission factor for this activity and a certain pollutant (\(EF_{p,a}\)):

(1)#\[L_{p,a} = AR_a * EF_{p,a}\]

Releases are distributed in space according to two alternative methods:

  1. The activity rate is known for a larger geographic area (region, country). The releases are first calculated at this aggregated level and then distributed in space using an auxiliary spatial variable called a “locator”.

  2. The activity rate is already a spatially distributed variable and can be directly used to calculate spatially variable releases.

The quantified releases are allocated to various initial receptors and routed towards the final receiving compartments: the soil system or the surface waters. Initial receptors can be: (1) the surface waters (directly), (2) the soil system (directly), (3) impermeable surfaces, (4) permeable surfaces, (5) the sewage collection system (combined or separated) and (6) the separate rainwater collection system.

The emissions related to stormwater and wastewater are simulated as follows:

  • The allocation of the wastewater releases from households to initial receptors should take into account the share of unconnected households and the share of households using septic tanks or other “individual or appropriate systems” (IAS, as defined under the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive).

  • The substances washed off from impermeable areas find their way to a separate rainwater collection system, a combined collection system for stormwater and wastewater or to surface waters and soils in places where there is no collection system.

  • Separate collection systems discharge to surface waters, while a retention term can be defined that is partly allocated to soils (re-use or distribution of sludge).

  • Combined collection systems discharge via a WWTP, where the treatment level can be variable.

  • Combined collection systems feature overflow events (CSOs), during which the treatment is bypassed; CSOs are a fixed fraction or occur if a daily rainfall threshold is exceeded.

Implementation#

The EM is currently configured for 6 compartments.

Abbreviation

Description

Sew

Sewer system that receives wastewater and (optionally) stormwater

Pav

Paved or impermeable surfaces

Unp

Unpaved or permeable surfaces

Stw

Sewer system that receives only stormwater

Sfw

Final recipient surface water, all matter that ends up here is “emissions to surface waters”

Soi

Final recipient soil system, all matter that ends up here is “emissions to soils”

In the EM software, these compartments are mathematically represented by substances. The mass of the simulated substances is expressed in grams. Transports from one compartment to another (in g s-1) are mathematically represented by “process fluxes” (transformations of one substance into another substance). This comes back in the mass balance output.

As the mathematical concept of a “substance” is used to represent compartments, EM has been set up to run for one “true” substance at a time.

Formulation#

Releases#

Releases of substances are quantified per time step. Releases from atmospheric deposition are automatically allocated to the proper receiving compartment (paved surfaces, unpaved surfaces and surface waters) depending on the local conditions that follow from the supportive hydrology model. Releases from other sources need to be allocated to the proper receiving compartment by the user. Optionally, a part of the releases can be preliminary allocated to wastewater. The subsequent allocation of the wastewater to receiving compartments can then be arranged by a supportive process GenWWman.

Paved surfaces#

The figure below shows a schematic overview of the fate of releases to paved areas. Substances reaching paved areas undergo a decay process and can be washed off. The fraction that is not removed by runoff or decay remains in the paved emission pool. The intensity of runoff is regulated by the rainfall intensity. Wash-off starts at a threshold of 2 mm runoff and the removed fraction linearly increases to 100% at a runoff intensity of 5 mm. This relation is fixed in the model code.

../_images/EM_PavedSurfaces.png

Schematic overview of the pathway that releases follow when distributed to the paved areas. The fate of the release is either runoff to storm water or decay and thereby removal from the model.

In formulas:

(2)#\[f_{runoff} = max \left( min \left( \frac{RO - 2}{5 - 2},1 \right),0 \right)\]
(3)#\[F_{loss} = k_{paved} M\]
(4)#\[F_{runoff} = \left( \frac{M}{\Delta t} + L - F_{loss} \right) * f_{runoff}\]

where

\(f_{runoff}\)

fraction washed off by surface runoff (-)

\(RO\)

actual surface runoff intensity (mm/d)

\(F_{loss}\)

flux lost by decay (g/d)

\(k_{paved}\)

decay rate (1/d)

\(M\)

mass available on paved surfaces (g)

\(F_{runoff}\)

flux washed off by surface runoff (g/d)

\(L\)

releases to paved surfaces (g/d)

\(\Delta t\)

time step in calculation (d)

The washed off substances are distributed over different compartments:

  • A fraction FrSewered is distributed over the Sew and Stw compartments according to the parameter fComSew.

  • Out of the remainder, a fraction fOpenWater is allocated to Sfw and the rest to Soi.

Unpaved surfaces#

The figure below presents a schematic overview of the simulated pathways for unpaved areas. The unpaved pool is undergoing burial and decay. Both processes remove substances from the simulation. Depending on the hydrological conditions, a fraction of the pool can be washed off, infiltrate or erode. The fraction of the emission that is not removed by any of these processes remains in the unpaved pool.

The pool is split into fractions bound and unbound to soil particles (parameter \(Kd_{unpaved}\)). The bound fraction can erode, the unbound fraction can infiltrate and be washed off. Erosion depends on the rainfall intensity: 10 - 20 mm rainfall is equivalent to 0 - 100% erosion (see figure below). Wash-off and infiltration also depend on rainfall intensity: 0 - 7 mm of combined runoff and infiltration lead to 0 - 100% of mobilization, distributed over wash-off and infiltration in accordance with the hydrological fluxes.

../_images/EM_UnpavedSurfaces.png

Schematic overview of the pathways in unpaved areas. The releases are first divided over the bound and unbound fractions. The fate of the unbound fraction is either runoff to the storm water collection system (runoff) or infiltration to the soil. The fate of the bound fraction is erosion. Both fractions will experience burial and decay and thereby removal from the model.

In formulas:

(5)#\[f_{erosion} = max \left( min \left( \frac{RA - 10}{20 - 10},1 \right),0 \right)\]
(6)#\[f_{mob} = max \left( min \left( \frac{RO + INF}{7},1 \right),0 \right)\]
(7)#\[f_{runoff} = max \left( min \left( \frac{RO}{RO + INF},1 \right),0 \right)\]
(8)#\[f_{infilt} = max \left( min \left( \frac{INF}{RO + INF},1 \right),0 \right)\]
(9)#\[F_{loss} = \left( k_{unpaved} + b \right) M\]
(10)#\[F_{part} = Kd_{unpaved} * \left( \frac{M}{\Delta t} + L - F_{loss} \right)\]
(11)#\[F_{dis} = \left(1 - Kd_{unpaved} \right) * \left( \frac{M}{\Delta t} + L - F_{loss} \right)\]
(12)#\[F_{erosion} = F_{part} * f_{erosion}\]
(13)#\[F_{infilt} = F_{dis} * f_{mob} * f_{infilt}\]
(14)#\[F_{runoff} = F_{dis} * f_{mob} * f_{runoff}\]

where

\(f_{erosion}\)

fraction eroded by surface runoff (-)

\(f_{mob}\)

fraction mobilised by runoff or infiltration (-)

\(f_{runoff}\)

fraction mobilised by surface runoff (-)

\(f_{infilt}\)

fraction mobilised by infiltration (-)

\(RO\)

actual surface runoff intensity (mm/d)

\(RA\)

actual rainfall intensity (mm/d)

\(INF\)

actual infiltration intensity (mm/d)

\(F_{loss}\)

flux lost by decay (g/d)

\(k_{unpaved}\)

decay rate (1/d)

\(b\)

burial rate (1/d)

\(Kd_{unpaved}\)

partition fraction (-)

\(M\)

mass available on unpaved surfaces (g)

\(F_{loss}\)

flux lost by decay (g/d)

\(L\)

releases to unpaved surfaces (g/d)

\(\Delta t\)

time step in calculation (d)

\(F_{part}\)

particulate flux available for transport (-)

\(F_{dis}\)

dissolved flux available for transport (-)

\(F_{erosion}\)

erosion flux by surface runoff (-)

\(F_{runoff}\)

runoff flux (-)

\(F_{infilt}\)

infiltration flux (-)

The washed off and eroded fractions are routed to the Sfw compartment. The infiltrating fraction is routed to the Soi compartment.

Combined sewer systems#

A flux from the Sew to surface water is defined that corresponds to leakages and combined sewer overflows (CSO’s). This is controlled by the parameter SewLeakage. If this parameter is a positive number, it represents a constant leakage fraction. If this parameter is negative, it represents a precipitation threshold. If the threshold is exceeded, the inflow to the Sew compartment is directly routed to Sfw.

The parameters LocWWTP and RecWWTP allow a man-induced horizontal displacement of the collected water in the Sew compartment. This is only relevant in small scale applications, e.g. in cities.

The substances remaining in Sew undergo a treatment. The fate of the substances in the influent is fixed by the parameters specifying the fractions that end up in effluent (Eff_WWTP) and in sludge (Sld_WWTP) respectively. These two parameters implicitly determine the removal by wastewater treatment (1 - Eff_WWTP-Sld_WWTP).

Separated sewer systems#

The parameters LocSTW and RecSTW allow a man-induced horizontal displacement of the collected water in the Sew and Stw compartments respectively. This is only relevant in small scale applications, e.g. in cities.

The substances remaining in Stw can partly be retained. The fate of the substances in the influent is fixed by the parameters specifying the fractions that end up in effluent (Eff_RS) and in sludge (Sld_RS) respectively. These two parameters implicitly determine the retention (1 - Eff_RS-Sld_RS).

Input#

Name in model

Definition

Unit

Spatial function?

fComSew

fraction of combined sewers

(-)

yes

SewLeakage

sewer leakage / CSO definition

(-) or mm/day

yes

LocWWTP

whereto for mixed sewers

(-)

yes

RecWWTP

receivers of mixed sewers

(-)

yes

LocSTW

whereto for rain sewers

(-)

yes

RecSTW

receivers of rain sewers

(-)

yes

kBurial

burial rate of unpaved pool

(-)

no

DecPav

decay rate paved (substance dependent)

(/d)

no

DecUnp

decay rate unpaved (substance dependent)

(/d)

no

KdUnpa

fraction of bound vs unbound (substance dependent)

(-)

no

EF_DDp

dry deposition rate (substance dependent)

(g/m2/d)

yes

EF_WDp

wet deposition rate (substance dependent)

(g/m3)

yes

Eff_WWTP

fraction of substance in WWTP influent that reaches the effluent (substance dependent)

(-)

yes

Sld_WWTP

fraction of substance in WWTP influent that reaches the sludge (substance dependent)

(-)

yes

Eff_RS

Fraction to effluent of rain sewers influent (substance dependent)

(-)

yes

Sld_RS

Fraction to sludge of rain sewers influent (substance dependent)

(-)

yes

FrSewered

fraction wastewater and stormwater intercepted by sewer systems

(-)

yes

WWtoSew

fraction of wastewater allocated to mixed sewers

(-)

yes

WWtoSfw

fraction of wastewater allocated to surface waters

(-)

yes

WWtoSoi

fraction of wastewater allocated to soils

(-)

yes

EV_A01

emission variable of source A01

( X )

no

LOC_A01

locator variable of source A01

( Y )

yes

EF_A01

emission factor of source A01 (substance dependent)

(kg/d/X)

yes

A01toWW

released fraction to wastewater of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toSew

released fraction to mixed sewers of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toPav

released fraction to paved areas of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toUnp

released fraction to unpaved areas of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toStw

released fraction to separated sewers of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toSfw

released fraction to surface waters of source A01

(-)

yes

A01toSoi

released fraction to soils of source A01

(-)

yes

EV_B01

locator/EV variable of source B01

( X )

yes

EF_B01

emission factor of source B01 (substance dependent)

(kg/d/X)

yes

B01toWW

released fraction to wastewater of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toSew

released fraction to mixed sewers of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toPav

released fraction to paved areas of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toUnp

released fraction to unpaved areas of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toStw

released fraction to separated sewers of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toSfw

released fraction to surface waters of source B01

(-)

yes

B01toSoi

released fraction to soils of source B01

(-)

yes

Note

  • Where “Spatial function?” is indicated as “yes”, the user has the option to specify the related input as a function of space. Where this is indicated as “no”, any defined spatial variability is neglected (the value for the first cell will be applied model-wide).

  • A supportive process can provide the allocation of the substances released to wastewater to the receiving compartments (WWtoSew, etc.) (see GenWWman).

  • A supportive process can provide the WWTP treatment parameters (Eff_WWTP, Sld_WWTP) as a spatially variable mix of up to three available treatment levels (see GenWWman).

  • Note that some parameters are substance dependent. The user should take care to define realistic values.

Output#

The simulated emissions to surface waters (Emis_Sfw; g/s) and to soils (Emis_Soi; g/s) are available for output.

Waste water management supportive process (GenWWman)#

Introduction#

This process supports the emission modelling as discussed in EM_GSS by providing the allocation of the substances released to wastewater to the receiving compartments (WWtoSew, etc.) and by providing the WWTP treatment parameters (Eff_WWTP, Sld_WWTP) as a spatially variable mix of up to three available treatment levels.

Implementation#

The process is implemented for the compartments listed in Table EM compartments. The local treatment capacity can be specified for up to three levels of treatment, each with different properties.

Formulation#

Allocation of wastewater to receiving compartments#

Wastewater is either collected in a sewer system (FrSewered), or in septic tanks (FrSeptic) or remains unmanaged (1 - FrSewered - FrSeptic).

For the fraction collected in septic tanks, a loss to surface waters (Eff_Septic) and to soils (Sld_Septic) can be defined. The remaining part is assumed transported to treatment plants by other means than sewer systems.

From the unmanaged wastewater, a fraction fOpenWater is allocated to surface waters, the remainder to soils.

Thus, the allocation of wastewater to the modelled compartments is:

(15)#\[WWtoSew = FrSewered + FrSeptic*(1-Eff\_Septic-Sld\_Septic)\]
(16)#\[WWtoSfw = FrUnManaged*fOpenWater + FrSeptic*Eff_Septic\]
(17)#\[WWtoSoi = FrUnManaged*(1-fOpenWater) + FrSeptic*Sld_Septic\]

Fate of substances reaching WWTPs#

The fraction of wastewater treated at three individual levels can be indicated. The remainder is assumed untreated:

(18)#\[FrUnTreated = 1 - FrTreat1 - FrTreat2 - FrTreat3\]

For each of the three treatment levels, the fraction of the influent reaching the effluent and the sludge respectively is specified. For the untreated fraction all influent reaches the effluent.

For the complete treatment system, the fractions reaching the effluent and the sludge equal:

(19)#\[\begin{split}Eff_WWTP = FrUnTreated + FrTreat1*Eff_Treat1 +\\ FrTreat2*Eff_Treat2 + FrTreat3*Eff_Treat3\end{split}\]
(20)#\[\begin{split}Sld_WWTP = FrTreat1*Sld_Treat1 + FrTreat2*Sld_Treat2 +\\ FrTreat3*Sld_Treat3\end{split}\]

In a final step, the fraction reaching sludge is corrected for “removal” of sludge by incineration and isolation. The remaining part is routed to soils in the main emission modelling process.

(21)#\[Sld_WWTP = Sld_WWTP*(1-fSldgRem)\]

Input#

Name in model

Definition

Unit

Spatial function?

FrSewered

fraction wastewater and stormwater intercepted by sewer systems

(-)

yes

FrSeptic

fraction wastewater to septic tanks

(-)

yes

FrTreat1

fraction wastewater primary treated

(-)

yes

FrTreat2

fraction wastewater secondary treated

(-)

yes

FrTreat3

fraction wastewater tertiary treated

(-)

yes

Eff_Septic

fraction directly to surface waters for septic tanks

(-)

yes

Eff_Treat1

fraction to effluent for primary treatment

(-)

yes

Eff_Treat2

fraction to effluent for secondary treatment

(-)

yes

Eff_Treat3

fraction to effluent for tertiary treatment

(-)

yes

Sld_Septic

fraction directly to soils for septic tanks

(-)

yes

Sld_Treat1

fraction to sludge for primary treatment

(-)

yes

Sld_Treat2

fraction to sludge for secondary treatment

(-)

yes

Sld_Treat3

fraction to sludge for tertiary treatment

(-)

yes

FrSldgRem

fraction of sludge removed (not reused)

(-)

yes

Note

  • Where “Spatial function?” is indicated as “yes”, the user has the option to specify the related input as a function of space. Where this is indicated as “no”, any defined spatial variability is neglected (the value for the first cell will be applied model-wide).

  • Note that some parameters are substance dependent. The user should take care to define realistic values.

Output#

The supportive process produces the below output, that feeds directly into the main emission modelling process.

Name in model

Definition

Unit

Eff_WWTP

fraction of substance in WWTP influent that reaches the effluent (substance dependent)

(-)

Sld_WWTP

fraction of substance in WWTP influent that reaches the sludge (substance dependent)

(-)

WWtoSew

fraction of wastewater allocated to mixed sewers

(-)

WWtoSfw

fraction of wastewater allocated to surface waters

(-)

WWtoSoi

fraction of wastewater allocated to soils

(-)